Darkside challenge in Cruiser magazine
+13
docbiggles
marang
Dapper
dond4605
13gator69
horseman8m
Larry Simpson
BigDarkster
Steve-O
Utah Motorcyclist
Badmoon
onei
hasbro56
17 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Darkside challenge in Cruiser magazine
YoIdaho wrote:
There is no way in H-E double toothpicks that anyone can make or take away someones choice to ride on a CT.good grunt!
You mean like how they can't make you wear a seatbelt in a car or wear a helmet? There are plenty of people who'd love to control every aspect of your life, and amazingly, they get to do it more and more everday, legally.
I don't like the sound of Zimmerman's article at all. He comes right out and says he doesn't condone darksiding, with zero experience. Then he goes on to say "Some [on these forums] dispute the facts provided by the tire manufacturers." What facts are being disputed by anyone on this forum? The fact that hard motorcycle tire rubber is more likely to break traction?
Speaking of facts, he has none to support his opposition to car tires on bikes. "I think I'll put my faith in the engineering staffs at Dunlop, Avon, and Metzler etc, and stick with motorcycle tires on my bikes." That doesn't sound like a very open minded opinion to me. Anyone who takes an honest look at the facts can see that a car tire is a superior choice for a cruiser.
Why would you prefer a smaller contact patch of harder rubber? That's no different than saying, I want to have less traction and be more likely to lose control of my bike, because this is how it came from the factory.
Oldsmobility- Number of posts : 124
Age : 40
Location : London OH
Registration date : 2009-08-25
Re: Darkside challenge in Cruiser magazine
As I recall the writer has already replied to people personally and stated that he cannot endorse riding with a CT, however he had ridden with someone who had a CT and was impressed. (At least that is the official rumor on VTXOA)
I really think this is a dead horse that was buried out back and everyone at Cruiser magazine vowed to never speak of it again.
I really think this is a dead horse that was buried out back and everyone at Cruiser magazine vowed to never speak of it again.
Last edited by Doc Rogers on Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:28 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo)
Doc Rogers- Number of posts : 80
Location : In progress
Registration date : 2009-03-03
RE DARKSIDE CHALLENGE IN CRUISER MAGAZINE
#1111111,Finally ,You have restored my faith in the younger generation with a little common senseOldsmobility wrote:YoIdaho wrote:
There is no way in H-E double toothpicks that anyone can make or take away someones choice to ride on a CT.good grunt!
You mean like how they can't make you wear a seatbelt in a car or wear a helmet? There are plenty of people who'd love to control every aspect of your life, and amazingly, they get to do it more and more everday, legally.
I don't like the sound of Zimmerman's article at all. He comes right out and says he doesn't condone darksiding, with zero experience. Then he goes on to say "Some [on these forums] dispute the facts provided by the tire manufacturers." What facts are being disputed by anyone on this forum? The fact that hard motorcycle tire rubber is more likely to break traction?
Speaking of facts, he has none to support his opposition to car tires on bikes. "I think I'll put my faith in the engineering staffs at Dunlop, Avon, and Metzler etc, and stick with motorcycle tires on my bikes." That doesn't sound like a very open minded opinion to me. Anyone who takes an honest look at the facts can see that a car tire is a superior choice for a cruiser.
Why would you prefer a smaller contact patch of harder rubber? That's no different than saying, I want to have less traction and be more likely to lose control of my bike, because this is how it came from the factory.
Larry Simpson- Number of posts : 1007
Age : 74
Location : Okmulgee,Ok
Registration date : 2008-08-18
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|